<<< o >>>Photo Friday: Speed 33 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

Update: Despite what I said below I decided to enter this shot for this week's Photo Friday challenge – Speed. It doesn't show speed, but it does involve speed. Besides which, I know I'm not going to have time to shoot anything more obviously relevant. Also, I've put the original of this shot up here:

.../archives/in_motion.php

As you can see, the changes aren't too drastic. Oh, and I was trying to work out why the original shot turned out so dark, and realised that I metered before the tree obscured the view; i.e. the exposure was set prior to the tree entering the shot.

--- original entry follows ---

I have mixed feelings about this shot, particularly as presented here (i.e. I suspect a printed version would look better), but I'm putting it up for the sake of interest, not least because it's a straight shot (well, other than the colorisation, and a Levels and Curves adjustment). I took this from the train on the way home yesterday, and it started out as an attempt to produce something for this week's Photo Friday challenge – Speed – i.e. use a slow shutter speed and pan the shot on an item in the middle distance. However, as I took this shot a tree went past, or rather I went past a tree, which obscured the view of the pylon. Anyway, I thought the almost 'pen and ink' feel to this shot was rather interesting so I've put it up.

As for the Photo Friday challenge; I guess I'll have to shoot something else.

Oh, and this is another one that looks better if you have your nose against the screen ;-)

capture date
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
white balance
cropped?
5.21pm on 5/10/04
Canon 20D
EF 50mm f/1.8 II
f14.0
1/8
shutter priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
auto
minor
 
3x2 + photo friday
comment by Sharon & Maneck at 10:13 PM (GMT) on 6 October, 2004

We like it very much! It looks like a painting.

comment by Peter Asquith at 10:24 PM (GMT) on 6 October, 2004

Very much like a washed pen and ink, with a hint of rag work at the bottom. I like it.

comment by PhilB at 11:40 PM (GMT) on 6 October, 2004

I like this too, but I'm not certain why. I think it's mainly the simplicity of the subject and composition (no complex lines like yesterday!), as well as the water-colouresque appearance. It's strangely relaxing and I think would definitely make a good poster.

I also had the idea of a slow shutter speed for this weeks Speed theme but decided to focus on people walking past to save me having to move! ; )

comment by Tiago P. at 12:38 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

great!
your best in a while.

comment by TropArts at 12:44 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Your photoblog is great - the technical information is really helpful too to novices like me. Thanks.

comment by Burk at 12:58 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

I also like this picture. It has a certain mystique about it. Your "fast moving tree" has actually made the picture more interesting, than it would have been otherwise.

comment by tiffany at 01:06 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

One of your best, though if I saw this picture anywhere else I wouldn't have guessed it was yours. I love it though - I'm more of an artist than a photographer and I agree, it feels like pen and ink. I can see it printed on rough paper. It has a hushed feel.

comment by 'daisies at 01:07 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Its beautiful ... like a work of art ... I love everything about this one :)

comment by Joseph Holmes at 01:41 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Sorry to disagree with you, Dave, but this one's stunning. It's not just the blur, but the narrow color range. Yes, pen and ink. Peter Asquith put it best, above.

comment by Craig Davis at 04:44 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Strong shot - gouache on CCD.

I've been checking out your site for a couple weeks - reading of your camera struggles while generally loving the site shots/format/dialog. When I saw this shot my first thought was "the 20D is becoming more comfortable" (I first went to check if you'd slipped back to the g5). Second thought was "I definitely don't feel like I've seen it before - your exploration is working."

Very cool shot.

Also I owe you some thanks - your site's inspired me to get organized and start posting occasionally. I just put up the start of a new project:

(http://www.twodogdesign.com/shotz/dumpsters/)

comment by miklos at 05:23 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

It's a cool shot and all... visually.. but I'm kind of skeptical about this, with that description and the specs indicated..

comment by tiffany at 06:19 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Dude, did you just call Dave a liar? *gasp* Take it back!

comment by djn1 at 07:19 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

thanks everyone. I'll write more later (I'm about to leave for work) but in the meanwhile ...

miklos: I've checked the EXIF data (which is correct - I enter it manually so it could have been wrong), and am pretty happy with my description (the original was a stop or two darker than this and, obviously, not a colorised b&w shot), so am a bit unsure about what you're sceptical about?

comment by Lyle at 07:39 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

My only scepticism about the photo is that it was on a British train, and you were going fast enough for the tree to be blurred in 1/8sec. *grin* Now if it were an 8 second exposure, I'd be more credulous! :¬)

comment by Lyle at 07:42 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Oh, and yes, the photo itself is stunning. Oddly, it's only in the thumbnail at the top of the comments that you really still see the shape of the tree - but that's no bad thing. And the tree provides that "pen and ink" line feel to it.

When I first saw the photo, I thought it must have been through several photoshop filters in order to get the effect - I'm both impressed and jealous as hell that it wasn't.

Definitely a poster for future decoration.

comment by Timmargh at 10:59 AM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Ooh, crikey - this is a good one! At first I thought it looked like the pylon was about to explode.

comment by john at 01:06 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Yet another super example as to why you are the top of the list. Congratulations for posting such exciting and innovative work.

comment by darragh at 01:19 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

i love this shot. the very-blurred tree gives a very original effect.

comment by magf at 01:34 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Its so like a painting. Excelent picture. Congrats.

comment by chuck at 01:41 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

as a newbie, what is 'pan the shot' and how does one do it?

nice site and photos. kudos.

comment by djn1 at 01:46 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

chuck: panning a shot means moving the camera such that it stays pointed at whatever you're shooting for the whole time the shutter is open. For example, if you look at a typical motor-sport shot you'll notice that the car is in focus but the background is blurred. Had the photographer kept her camera still, rather than moving it in accord with the vehicle, the background would have been sharp but not the car. So, in this instance, I just kept the camera pointing at the pylon as I composed and took the shot.

comment by Joakim at 02:30 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Wonderful! Chinese electricity! As TropArts above, I appreciate your effort to provide us the technical information. I'd love to see more detailed specs of your Photoshop treatments, but that's perhaps too much to ask...

comment by emarquetti at 04:15 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Driving and photographing eh Mr. John? :-)

comment by P at 04:34 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

this was a straight shot?! damn you're good! this is a beautiful capture in my book -- i too would love to see it printed on linen or rough paper.

comment by justin at 05:51 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Very, very nice! works on many levels for me, but I won't bore you all by getting metaphysical!

comment by djn1 at 06:05 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Just a quick note for those of you checking back to let you know that I amended the description for this shot.

comment by fraxinus at 09:17 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

superb - part of what photography is all about

comment by djn1 at 10:56 PM (GMT) on 7 October, 2004

Thanks everyone. This was one of those shots that I really liked when I first produced it but, after a while, I couldn't decide quite what to make of it, so it's great to get such positive feedback.

comment by tom at 01:22 AM (GMT) on 8 October, 2004

whoah! this is amazing stuff. it may not have been done on purpose, but i think the streak of the tree is stunning.

when i first saw it i thought it was taken through a dirty window - which frankly wouldn't be unlikely for a shot from a train in the UK. and i don't know of it's the tinting, but the shot has a kind of magical autumn evening feel to it, which i love.

comment by TANIO at 05:49 PM (GMT) on 8 October, 2004

OH! FUCKING SORTED!

comment by Sandra Rocha at 11:28 PM (GMT) on 9 October, 2004

indeed one of the best I've seen in a while :-)
that "pen and ink" you mentioned is exactly what I get from it, lovely
~~

comment by Maxine at 09:30 PM (GMT) on 7 November, 2004

Amazing photo Dave. Just love when you do painting with your camera. Thanks for the visual pleasure!

comment by MTSUpsycho at 05:41 AM (GMT) on 15 March, 2005

you have a talent with the lens. enjoy your log, thanks for sharing