I really couldn't decide which of these I preferred, and didn't think they were sufficiently different to be put up as separate entries, so thought I'd put them both up. And on reflection, I think it would have been good to have included a third shot of the bottom of this structure as well. But I was shooting over the top of fairly substantial steel fence to get these two and couldn't get a decent angle on the base.

As always, let me know what you think.

On another matter: I spent a few hours talking to Kris today, who's conducting a one year study into 'personal' photography and the web (funded by the ESRC). Thanks Kris, it was very interesting.

And finally: how many photobloggers does it take a change a lightbulb? Just one :-)

capture date
camera
lens
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
2.50pm on 1/2/05
Canon 20D
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
f/8.0
1/200
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
C1 Pro
minor distortion
<<< prev / latest / next >>> // 25 comments // archives + galleries + thumbs // RSS // about + blog // store + training and tutorials
AboutBlogCommissionsPhotoblogGalleriesPrintsStock imagesStoreTraining<<< hide these links 
chromasia.com
Boyle's law / 2 February, 2005 [click for previous image: this is rubbish]
Boyle's law / 2 February, 2005 [click for next image: signal spikes]
Sign up for our mailing list here
© 2003–14 • all rights reserved