Thanks to Roy's comment on yesterday's entry I now know (as with yesterday's shot) that this is a part of St. Anne's Pier that burnt down – reducing its overall length from 914' to 600'.

I also have another shot of this structure that I may well put up tomorrow. I'm pretty pleased with it, but on reflection I think the composition could have been a bit better so I may reshoot it tomorrow. That said, if it's as windy as it was today I probably won't bother – as I walked along the beach today the wind was so strong it felt as though it would take my legs out from under me. And interestingly, when we first moved here, I found the sea winds quite difficult to deal with for any length of time. Inland the wind seems much less constant – a gust, a lull, another gust, and so on – but when it's windy on the beach it's continuous. Having got used to it though I find it kind of reassuring – something to escape into perhaps.

Anyway, enough rambling – tell me what you think about this one. I like it.

Oh, and this one, IMO, looks better with the dark theme.

capture date
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
cropped?
2.43pm on 12/11/04
Canon 20D
EF 17-40 f/4L USM
17mm (27mm equiv.)
f/8.0
1/100
aperture priority
+0.0
evaluative
100
no
RAW
no
<<< prev / latest / next >>> // 12 comments // archives + galleries + thumbs // RSS // about us + blog // store + training and tutorials
AboutBlogCommissionsPhotoblogGalleriesPrintsStock imagesStoreTraining<<< hide these links 
chromasia.com
tide down too / 12 November, 2004 [click for previous image: tide down]
tide down too / 12 November, 2004 [click for next image: tide down #3]
© 2003–14 • all rights reserved