<<< o >>>on the right tracks 21 comments + add yours
chromasia.com

I wasn't going to post anything else until Monday – I'm trying to spin out the few remaining shots that I have because I know I wont have any time for shooting this week – but we're celebrating today, so I had to put something up :-)

When I posted my 'no it's not a texture' shot of Elvis yesterday I mentioned that Libby was out at the Northwest Women in Business Awards 2009 awards ceremony as she had been nominated for the Best New Business category in her role as head honcho of our training company (i.e. the one that runs our online Photoshop tutorials, sorts out one-to-one training, and so on).

Anyway, I'm really pleased to say that she won, but won't tell you any more about it because she's also written about it on her new blog: including a shot of the shoes ;-)

On which note, back to this one ...

It was taken three minutes after the sequence I used for this shot, but facing the other way down the tracks, and as with a lot of my recent HDR work it was constructed from a seven shot sequence using Photomatix Pro. In this instance, while I didn't want it to end up looking like a straight shot, I didn't want it to look like a typical HDR image either.

Anyway, I like it, but would be interested to hear what you all think.

On a related note: Craig has just posted a shot of this same scene, taking a wider view than me – it looks good.

captured
camera
lens
focal length
aperture
shutter speed
shooting mode
exposure bias
metering mode
ISO
flash
image quality
RAW converter
cropped?
11.11 on 10/1/09
Canon 1Ds Mark II
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
19mm
f/8.0
1/5 to 1/400 (seven shots)
aperture priority
n/a
evaluative
100
no
RAW
Photomatix Pro
minor transformation
 
3x2 + HDR
comment by Nicki at 04:18 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

The first one i thougt was: "froooozen scenery". Everything on homelands outback is frozen this time. And yes: I'm a groupie of HDR processing, thats why i love this kind of "stories" like your images tells.

comment by Ilan at 04:19 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

Beautifully done! Truly amazing. The HDR turns something that might appear so mundane to a real eye candy - Almost a painting in fact.

However, I must ask, and this photo is a great example (and sorry if this issue was already brought up) - As a photographer, do you prefer to be praised for the subject of the photo, or the process/result of manipulation?

comment by djn1 at 04:25 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

Thanks Nicki.

Ilan: while the subject and the post-production are clearly separate things - the former definitely comes before the latter - I tend to think of them as part of the same whole. Put another way, the post-production allows me to show you something about the objects I photograph that wouldn't be apparent if I post-processed them differently. My apologies if that doesn't answer your question, but it isn't one that I can relate all that well to the way I see things. Does that make sense?

comment by Mirko Herzner at 04:33 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

This is realyl nice. I especially like the angle and fine textures. Not the typical HDR. Still, you made best use of the technique.

comment by eric at 04:38 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

whaowwww super picture of rails frozen , we can feel the cold, very nice

comment by Craig at 04:58 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

I like this a lot, it never ceases to amaze me how much fine scale detail is captured & brought out in these HDR's which I think is what attracts me to them. I've been out trying some myself this afternoon-we'll see how that pans out!

In the meantime you've had me hooked on textures this week, better post something else tomorrrow before eveyone's bored!

Congrats to your wife for the well deserved award :O)

comment by owen-b at 05:39 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

It being a stylised HDR image I probably shouldn't bother posting but what the hey, comments can be constructively critical as well as praising, right? :)

I think it does look like a typical HDR I'm afraid - the weird lack of shadows, the characteristic blotchiness here and there where shadows have crept back in, the unrealistic detail. It's striking but to me it's too fake and I've seen much more organic, contrasty, striking HDRs from you that didn't shout "I'm an HDR!" first and foremost. I think HDR has a tendency to render things a bit flat. I guess I just like shadows and contrast! :)

I like the framing, though - and congratulations, Libby!

comment by Gary Eddleston at 06:35 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

I feel HDR has transformed an image which could have been a shot you kept but never published. It draws your eyes to look at the detail of the image.

comment by Dan Kaufman at 06:39 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

I think we all tend to interpret what we see with an underlying expectation how it should look. These rails certainly look cold and frosted--ala the magic of HDR. It gives a graphic illustration quality to the photo, but again our eyes and brain "know" it's a photograph where we should have a smooth tonal texture. And thus the dichotomy, the tension, that to me makes this a compelling image.

comment by Alan at 07:43 PM (GMT) on 24 January, 2009

I do like the shot, and although I am undecided about HDR on the whole I do like the way it brings the textures to life. It manages to really capture the detail so well.

Congratulations to Libby too.

comment by Abel at 02:41 AM (GMT) on 25 January, 2009

It is not too HDRed, which I thinks goes well for this image. Good thing those railway tracks are abandoned... :) A.

comment by csj @ID7 (twitter) at 10:49 AM (GMT) on 25 January, 2009

I actually prefer your version of this image for the sheer amount of detail it contains and the tonality I know the full version contains....I concede defeat! ;-) csj

comment by djn1 at 12:01 PM (GMT) on 25 January, 2009

Craig: shut up, it's not better, not least because your version wouldn't suit the same treatment - i.e. add in this amount of detail and your version would look too artificial (in my opinion at least) :)

comment by Chris Wray at 01:23 PM (GMT) on 25 January, 2009

Yep, like this one. Same as the others have said, it really brings out the detail in the frost. It doesn't suffer the halo'ing ( is that a real word ?) seen when some images are processed, which makes it all the better. Good crop on the diagonals too.

comment by Justin Photis at 06:49 PM (GMT) on 25 January, 2009

I think both the shots of the rail line look very good because they aren't as extreme as you could have pushed them. You can almost feel the texture on the rail and wood, that's amazing.
And well done to Libby.

comment by Picstopick at 09:29 AM (GMT) on 26 January, 2009

I just love the bended and eroded steel. Incredible pleonasm cold/frozen and steel.

comment by ApoChromatic at 12:33 PM (GMT) on 26 January, 2009

Nice use of HDR here. It seems frozen! (Is it?)

comment by Ilan at 03:34 PM (GMT) on 26 January, 2009

djn1 - Thanks for answering me. You brought an interesting angle that I didn't fully considered before.
I see a (good) photography as showing someone something that wouldn't be apparent to the him in "dimension" of time - i.e decisive moment. But you brought an interesting point, of another, so called "dimension" - seeing the world through another man eyes - and most importantly - not necessarily as they are really truly appear. Does that make sense? :)
Interesting thought, I need to sleep on that :)

comment by djn1 at 03:38 PM (GMT) on 26 January, 2009

Ilan: yes, that's exactly what I mean. Put another way: I think that photography is much more to do with interpretation than representation; i.e. the subjective rather than the literal.

comment by Anna at 04:16 PM (GMT) on 26 January, 2009

Excellent work and details!
Anna :)

comment by Eric at 06:05 PM (GMT) on 26 January, 2009

Cool tone mapping, well processed, btw nice shot ;-))